Cassetta v. Baima
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GATES, J., pro tem.
P laintiff commenced this action against the defendant Baima and others upon a promissory note for the sum of $700, which note was executed by said defendant and one Ben Zalunardo on or about August 20, 1923, in favor of themselves. The instrument at the time of its execution was undated, with the exception of the numerals “1923,” which were in the upper right-hand corner of the paper. It mentions no amount as principal nor as interest, except that in the upper left-hand corner is found the following: “$700.00.” The note, among other things, recites:
“One day after date, for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walsh v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- More v. FingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Weston v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Johnston Harvester Co v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Edwards v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Rancho San Carlos, Inc. v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Reser v. Southern Kansas Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Benson v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hussain v. Malik (In Re Hussain)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.