Legal Opinion

People v. Woon Tuck Wo

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1898No. Crim. No. 300PublishedCited by 51 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree, the jury fixing his punishment at imprisonment for life. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. Appellant contends for a reversal of the judgment on account of alleged misconduct of the court, which consisted of remarks made by the judge of the court at the trial concerning certain reporter’s notes. There were some differences between attorneys as to certain reporter’s notes which were offered in evidence, and the remarks of the court objected to were, substantially, simply that the jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PiperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MuggIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. People v. LevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. JustusOregon Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Huggard v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API