Gavin v. Gavin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The brief of counsel for appellant is substantially a mere recapitulation of the general assignments of error as they appear in the bill of exceptions. It contains frequent general statements, such as that “ the evidence was insufficient to justify the decision,” that “ the court erred ” in making certain findings of fact, that the “ court erred in finding certain conclusions of law,” that the “ court erred in making the decree,” *293etc. But no reasons are given why the court erred, no views are presented as to the questions sought to be raised, and no authorities cited. Under these…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. San Vicente Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Vance v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Mills v. Los Angeles Junk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Baker v. Smith-Booth-Usher Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Ross v. StoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936