Legal Opinion

Evans v. Brentmar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 2003No. 97-1238-L-1; A110625PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their claims and awarding damages, attorney fees, and costs to defendants on defendants’ counterclaim. ORS 19.245(2)(b). The judgment, based on plaintiffs’ default, was entered on June 1, 2000, “nunc pro tunc, as of April 8, 1998.” Plaintiffs contend that the court erred in denying their motion to set aside the default judgment against them, in awarding attorney fees, and in entering the judgment nunc pro tunc. We hold that the court erred in awarding attorney fees and costs, in directing that the judgment be entered “nunc pro tunc, as of April 8,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gillespie v. KononenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Propp v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Frederick & Nelson v. BardOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. KLEMGARD v. Wade Seed Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Secor Investments, LLC v. AndereggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Delcastillo v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Matchey v. Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. In re the Marriage of UhdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API