Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Uhde

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2013No. 010361; A147493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Wife appeals a supplemental judgment that terminated husband’s spousal support obligation to wife, set wife’s child support obligation to husband, and awarded husband attorney fees. She challenges the court’s imposition of sanctions under ORCP 46 B and the court’s subsequent determinations that evolved from those sanctions. We affirm.

In 2003, the trial court entered a dissolution judgment. Wife appealed, and husband conditionally cross-appealed. Uhde and Uhde, 217 Or App 258, 175 P3d 511 (2007). On appeal, we reversed and remanded after concluding that the court erred in denying maintenance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In re the Marriage of MortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Evans v. BrentmarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. In Re the Marriage of UhdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. L & A Designs, LLC v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Noor and ChowdhuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API