Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. Kononen
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1990No. TC CSC 88-0481; CA A49273; SC S36540PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The issue in this FED action is whether the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over a case in which the trial judge has refused to enter a final judgment. We conclude that the Court of Appeals does have jurisdiction.
Defendant Kononen was a tenant in an apartment owned by Gillespie and managed by plaintiffs Cummings. On June 8,1988, the Cummings sent Kononen a “72-hour Notice To Pay Rent or Move,” former ORS 91.820(2) (now ORS 90.400(2)), and on June 13,1988, the Cummings initiated this FED action in their own names only.
On June 21,1988, the parties made a first appearance before the trial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Portland v. Carriage InnOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Executive Management Corporation v. JuckettOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Cranston v. StanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Wells v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Gillespie v. KononenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Secor Investments, LLC v. AndereggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. StarkOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Baugh v. Bryant Limited PartnershipsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. DreyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Stocker v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.