Legal Opinion
Propp v. Long
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1992No. CC A8907-04326; CA A67455; SC S38277PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.
The trial court entered judgment against plaintiff on August 30, 1990. Plaintiff moved for a new trial. The trial court did not act on plaintiffs motion within 55 days after judgment was entered. By operation of law, the motion was deemed denied. ORCP 64 F. Plaintiff appealed by a notice of appeal mailed by certified mail on November 26,1990, which was a Monday. Defendant moved to dismiss the appeal as untimely filed. Plaintiff resisted the motion on two alternate grounds: first, that the appeal period never started to run because no final judgment had been entered; or, second, that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Portland v. Carriage InnOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Moore v. West Lawn Memorial Park, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Zidell v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Crow v. Junior BootshopsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stupek v. Wyle Laboratories Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Haskins v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Brennan v. La Tourelle ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.