Matchey v. Staffing Network Holdings, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals an order denying its motion to set aside an order of default and default judgment. ORCP 69 C. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in finding that defendant had received notice that plaintiff intended to apply for a default judgment 10 days before entry of the default as required by ORCP 69 A. We affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant is an Illinois-based employment services company with a branch office in Oregon. Defendant hired plaintiff to manage the Oregon office. In October 2000, plaintiff left that position. On December 31, 2001, plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Wood v. James W. Fowler Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Montoya v. Housing Authority of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Evans v. BrentmarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- In re the Marriage of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Terlyuk v. KrasnogorovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- In re the Marriage of KotlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Unifund CCR Partners v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Much v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021