Legal Opinion
Beem v. Reichman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 12, 1918No. Civ. No. 1776PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to have a right of way declared from plaintiffs’ land over defendant Reichman’s land to a highway.
It is alleged in plaintiffs’ verified amended complaint that on June 16, 1909, defendant Reichman was the owner of a certain tract of land described as follows: “Commencing at the northwest corner of said SW^4 of SE14 of Section 35, in Township 44 North, of Range 9 West, M. D. M., and running thence south for the distance of 600 feet to a rock set in earth; thence running east for the distance of 100 feet to a rock set in earth; thence running a little east of north for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Blum v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Taylor v. WarnakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Barnard v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Grimmesey v. KirtlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Fischer v. HendlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Warfield v. BasichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Navarro v. PaulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.