Legal Opinion

Navarro v. Paulley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1944No. Civ. 14452PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

The facts in this case are mostly undisputed, and mostly stipulated, and appear to be as follows : 40th Place, in the city of Los Angeles, runs east and west to Normandie Avenue. And, of course, Normandie Avenue runs north and south. On the northeast corner of the junction of these two streets is Lot 29 of West Park Tract, No. 2. Lot 28 in. the same tract is immediately north of and adjoining Lot 29. These lots front 50 feet on Normandie Avenue and are 132.76 feet in depth.

In 1921 both lots were owned by one person, who erected two frame residences on Lot 29, one at the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Buss v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Cheda v. BodkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Jersey Farm Co. v. Atlanta Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Quinlan v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. McCarty v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Jordan v. HenckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Gagnon v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Leonard v. HaydonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API