Warfield v. Basich
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiff sued to quiet title to certain alleged easements over defendants’ property. Defendants cross-complained to quiet title against plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in favor of defendants.
Question Presented
Does the evidence establish an implied easement for ingress and egress over defendants’ land to plaintiff’s land?
Evidence
Both plaintiff’s lot and that of defendants’ originally belonged to one Bibbero. In 1911 he caused a four flat building to be erected on the lot now belonging to plaintiff. It bore four numbers, one of which was 2961. It had no garage but a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Gosney v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
- Reese v. BorghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Neary v. MartinHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.