Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Hendler

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1942No. Civ. 12000PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment declaring plaintiffs to he the owners of an easement created by implied grant, enjoining her from interfering with the use of the easement and awarding damages in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $165 plus costs.

The facts of the case are undisputed and appear from the stipulation to be as follows: In July, 1932, defendant owned two adjoining parcels of real property situated in the city of Los Angeles and designated as lots 18 and 19 of block “K” of the Forest Heights Tract. She constructed a four-unit dwelling on lot 18 and a four car garage at the rear of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Jersey Farm Co. v. Atlanta Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Grimmesey v. KirtlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Beem v. ReichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. A. Hamburger & Sons, Inc. v. LemboeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fristoe v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Thayer v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Mikels v. RagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Piazza v. SchaeferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API