Legal Opinion

Grimmesey v. Kirtlan

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1928No. Docket No. 6282PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.

This is an action to establish a right of way over certain property described in the complaint belonging to defendants. The cause is pleaded in three counts. The first sets up a right of way acquired by grant, pursuant to section 1104 of the Civil Code; the second, a right of way by prescription arising from adverse use for more than five years, and the third is a quiet title count to the easement claimed.

The complaint alleges that the defendants owned a parcel of land comprising approximately 41 acres situated in the northwest corner of the intersection of Ruddock…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cheda v. BodkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tarpey v. VeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Beem v. ReichmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Dooling v. DabelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Faus v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.(1956)California Court of Appeal · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API