Blum v. Weston
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Respondents are the owners of a certain parcel of land in Contra Costa county, which is bounded on the west by a county road, and on the east by lands of appellant Weston, and this action is brought against Weston and his tenant, White, to recover damages for alleged trespasses committed by crossing respondents’ land to the county road. The defendants (appellants here) in defense of the action alleged a way of necessity across plaintiffs’ land to reach the county road, and that in the use and enjoyment of said easement which is appurtenant to their land they traveled across…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smyles v. . HastingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Collins v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
- Ellis v. BassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Taylor v. WarnakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Waubun Beach Ass'n v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Greisinger v. KlinhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Ballard v. TitusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Ritchey v. WelshIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Lichty v. SickelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.