Barnard v. Lloyd
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
As we construe this complaint, the action is to abate obstructions in a private road or way, and for damages.
The general features of the case are as follows: One Snodgrass, who was the owner of a large tract of land, conveyed a portion of it to the plaintiff. At the time of this conveyance a road was laid out on a strip belonging to the grantor, along the south side of the land granted, and it was verbally agreed between -the grantor and grantee that this should be and remain a road for the plaintiff’s use, and he began using it as such. Subsequently, Snodgrass conveyed to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brennan v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Miles v. ThorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Taylor v. WarnakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Wakefield v. GreenhoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Reese v. BorghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Van Natta v. Nys & EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Warfield v. BassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.