Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Impaxx, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 2003No. B164006PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
OPINION
This is a wrongful termination case which presents a single issue concerning covenants not to compete. The case comes to us after the defendants'1 motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted. Thus, on this appeal, we deem true all material facts which were properly pleaded and determine whether the complaint states a cause of action. (Mack v. State Bar ofCalifornia (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 957 [112 Cal.Rptr.2d 341].) Applying those rules, we reverse.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morlife, Inc. v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kolani v. GluskaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- American Credit Indemnity Co. v. SacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Gordon v. LandauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Neville v. CHUDACOFFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Dowell v. Biosense Webster, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.