Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Landau
California Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1958No. L. A. 24273PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendant, after trial before the court without a jury, in an action seeking (a) damages and (b) an injunction restraining defendant from soliciting plaintiffs’ customers, plaintiffs appeal.
Facts: Plaintiffs are, and for about eight and one-half years have been, engaged in the house-to-house installment sales business. Their business is conducted by selling merchandise, generally to housewives in a low-income bracket, at their homes, with either a down payment of $1.00 or $2.00, or with no down payment at all. Weekly installments of $1.00 to $2.00 are thereafter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- California Intelligence Bureau v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- King v. GeroldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Gordon v. WassermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Gordon v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. PaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Kolani v. GluskaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.