Loral Corp. v. Moyes
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, Acting P. J.
The primary question in this proceeding is the validity of a termination agreement between an employer and its former employee which, inter alia, restrains the former employee from disrupting, damaging, impairing or interfering with his former employer’s business by “raiding” its employees. Plaintiff Loral Corporation and its subsidiary, Conic Corporation, brought this action against its former executive officer, Robert Moyes, claiming Moyes breached the agreement by inducing employees of plaintiff to work for Moyes’ subsequent employer, Aydin Corporation.
The trial…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Saunders v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Amn Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- WeRide Corp. v. Kun HuangDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.