Legal Opinion
Neville v. CHUDACOFF
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 2008No. B198253PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
73 Cal.Rptr.3d 383 (2008)
160 Cal.App.4th 1255
Mark NEVILLE, Cross-Complainant and Appellant,
v.
Greg CHUDACOFF et al, Cross-Defendant and Respondent.
No. B198253.
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Five.
March 12, 2008.
Law Offices of Paul Ottosi and Paul Ottosi for Cross-Complainant and Appellant.
Julia S. Swanson, Los Angeles, for Cross-Defendant and Respondent.
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
This is an appeal from an order granting a special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute. (Code Civ. Proc, § 425.16.)[1] An employer fired one of its employees amid allegations that the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Hansen v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Digerati Holdings, LLC v. Young Money Entertainment, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Chodos v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. FaiginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.