Legal Opinion

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 30, 2009No. 2008-1509, 2008-1510PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINN, Circuit Judge.

The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (“Stanford”) appeals a final judgment that the asserted claims of U.S. Patents No. 5,968,730 (“'730 patent”), No. 6,503,705 (“'705 patent”), and No. 7,129,041 (“'041 patent”) are invalid for obviousness. Bd. of Trs. v. Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 563 F.Supp.2d 1016 (N.D.Cal.2008) (“Invalidity Opinion ”). Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Corporation, and Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. (collectively, “Roche”) cross-appeal that part of the district court’s judgment relating to Roche’s…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Beach v. Ocwen Federal BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. v. NAVINTA LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. St. John's University, New York v. BoltonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  5. Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co., KG v. Janssen Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API