Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2008No. S147190PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We granted review to address the validity of noncompetition agreements in California and the permissible scope of employment release agreements. We limited our review to the following issues: (1) To what extent does Business and Professions Code section 166001 prohibit employee noncompetition agreements; and (2) is a contract provision requiring an employee to release “any and all” claims unlawful because it encompasses *942nonwaivable statutory protections, such as the employee indemnity protection of Labor Code section 2802?

We conclude that section 16600 prohibits employee…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Janken v. GM Hughes ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Villacres v. Abm Industries Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Asset Marketing Systems, Inc. v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API