Legal Opinion
Morlife, Inc. v. Perry
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 14, 1997No. A074958PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, J.
Respondent Morlife, Inc. (Morlife) brought this suit for damages and injunctive relief against its former employees, appellants Lloyd Perry and Carl Bowersmith, who had resigned and joined with appellant Donald R. Meyers to form Burlingame Builders, Inc. (Burlingame), a direct competitor of Morlife in the commercial roof repair market. Morlife claimed appellants unfairly competed with it by misappropriating confidential customer information in violation of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) *1518(Civ. Code, § 3426 et seq.).1 After a nonjury trial, the court found for Morlife,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Unilogic, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Vacco Industries, Inc. v. Van Den BergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- ABBA Rubber Co. v. SeaquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Reeves v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGSMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.