Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1909No. Docket No. 61PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Case by Charles A. Sewell against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff on the morning of Jan*408uary 23, 1907, boarded a car of the defendant company near his residence, and proceeded towards the downtown section of the city. At the intersection of Clifford street and Park Place the car in which plaintiff was riding collided with a car ahead of it, which had stopped to let off passengers. The force of the collision threw the plaintiff forward, and caused injuries which resulted in a permanent stiffening of the knee. The testimony on the part of the plaintiff tended to show that the cars came together with considerable force, and that the forward car…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kay v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Scott v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Gibbs v. Farmers' & Merchants' State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Dolph v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Howell v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Riggsby v. TrittonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Pattinson v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hines v. BeardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API