Legal Opinion

Howell v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1904No. Docket No. 106PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Case by Sarah E. Howell against the Lansing City Electric Railway Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant’s motorman lost control of the car he was in charge of, upon a grade on Washington avenue, in the city of Lansing. At the foot of the grade was a switch, and just beyond the switch the track turned upon Franklin avenue, which is intersected by Washington avenue at that point. It was customary for cars to meet and pass at the switch, and, as the uncontrolled car passed over or beyond the switch, the other car was visible, approaching on Franklin avenue a few hundred feet distant, and Was seen by the plaintiff across the corner. In her alarm she arose and started for the door, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olivier v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Gowdy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
  3. Ottinger v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Sewell v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Dupuis v. Saginaw Valley Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API