Legal Opinion

Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 5, 1968PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

51 N.J. 130 (1968)

238 A.2d 169

JAMES N. ROSENAU AND NORAH ROSENAU, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW JERSEY, AND WORTHINGTON GAMON METER COMPANY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 6, 1967.

Decided February 5, 1968.

Mr. Edward K. Zuckerman argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Robert M. Graham argued the cause for respondent Worthington Gamon Meter Company of Newark, New Jersey (Messrs. Champi, Graham and Franchino, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The Law Division entered a summary judgment in…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. County of Morris v. FauverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API