Legal Opinion

Burghardt v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1919No. Docket No. 33PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Case by Ernest C. Burghardt against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

On October 7, 1915, plaintiff while walking to a restaurant in the city of Detroit reached the corner of Gratiot and Farmer. He desired to cross Farmer but a car on the line of defendant was on that street and he waited for it to get by and then started across the street, passing to the rear of the car. The car track here curved both east and west. While passing the rear of the car, plaintiff was struck by the trolley pole which had become loosened in its socket and fell upon him causing injuries, claimed by him to be of a serious and permanent character. For the recovery of the damages thus…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barnowsky v. HelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Alpern v. ChurchillMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Sewell v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. La Fernier v. Soo River Lighter & Wrecking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Stowell v. Standard Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gadde v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hepp v. Quickel Auto & Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Pickwick Stages Corp. v. MessingerArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. MacRes v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API