Legal Opinion

Hines v. Beard

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 23, 1921PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Louisa county in a proceeding by motion for a judgment for damages. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

This is a proceeding by motion by J. W. Beard against Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, to recover damages for a personal injury. The plaintiff, Beard, was a passenger on a passenger train operated by the defendant, and the alleged injury was the result of the derailment of the coach in which he was being carried as a passenger for hire. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $2,000.00 which the trial court refused to set aside, and upon which it entered judgment for the plaintiff.

*289On September 19, 1919, the plaintiff purchased a ticket at Waynesboro from that point to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Kay v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Carroll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Hughes v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  5. Sewell v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Danville Community Hospital, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Riggsby v. TrittonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Easterling v. WaltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  4. Fleming v. HartrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Whitmore v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API