Legal Opinion

Scott v. Wood

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1889No. 11894PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

This action was brought to recover under a contract between the plaintiff and the firm of Hobart, Wood & Co. for services as salesman. Pending the action Hobart died, and the case was continued against Wood as surviving partner. The plaintiff had a verdict, and the defendant Wood appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

The respondent makes a preliminary objection to the record on appeal from the order denying a new trial, upon the ground that it does not show a notice of intention. This objection must be disallowed upon the authority of Pico v. Cohn, 78 Cal.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clark v. HillsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. BushtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Heinemann v. . HeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Murphy v. NettMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Cody v. Market St. Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API