People v. Morris
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FRICKE, J., pro tem.
Appellant and one Edmund Buisseret were found guilty of second degree burglary. The sole point on this appeal is that the evidence is insufficient in law to sustain the conviction of appellant.
It is conceded by appellant that on July 8, 1931, between 12:30 ánd 3:30 P. M., the residence of one Mrs. C. V. Holmburg was burglariously entered and that among other things an Illinois watch was stolen, being later, at about 4:30 P. M., pawned by a man who signed the pawnbroker’s ticket with the name “Bob Morrow”. Appellant was not identified by any witness as being at the scene of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. FarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. RadovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. GriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- People v. CitrinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. RansomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.