People v. Griggs

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

If the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s implied finding that appellant Amarías was the driver of the automobile to which his co-defendant Griggs ran, after an unsuccessful attempt to rob the complaining witness, the judgment must be affirmed. We find it sufficient.

The defendants were tried jointly on a charge of attempted robbery. From the evidence it appeared that the complaining witness, with $600 of her employer’s money in a suitcase, was driving to work in a small coupe. ' A big sedan drove up, stopped in front of her, the co-defendant alighted, then the…