Legal Opinion
State v. Scielzo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 24, 1983No. 10409PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*192Arthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant was charged in an amended information with the crime of larceny in the second degree by receiving and disposing of stolen goods with a value in excess of $500. See General Statutes (Rev. to 1977) §§ 53a-123 (a) (2),1 53a-119 (8).2 He was found guilty as charged after a trial to the jury. This appeal followed.
On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the state failed to prove that he knew or believed that the property he received was probably stolen; (2) the state failed to adduce evidence that the value of the property received by him exceeded $500; and (3) he…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.