Legal Opinion

People v. McFarland

California Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1962No. Crim. 7138PublishedCited by 319 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*752GIBSON, C. J.

A jury found defendant guilty on two counts of unlawfully taking an automobile (Veh. Code, § 10851), five counts of burglary of the second degree (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460), and one count of grand theft (Pen. Code, §487, subd. 1). The sentences imposed by the court for the taking of automobiles were made concurrent with each other but consecutive With respect to concurrent sentences imposed on the burglary counts. The sentence for grand theft was made consecutive with respect to the other sentences. Defendant has appealed, contending, among other things, that the evidence is…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by319 opinions

  1. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

314 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API