Legal Opinion

People v. Citrino

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1956No. Crim. 5779PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of second degree burglary.

During the evening of June 3, 1954, or the early morning of June 4th, the premises of William and Frederick Motors in San Francisco were burglarized. An automobile, various items of garage equipment, a battery, and tools were taken. During the evening of June 5, 1954, or the early morning of June 6th, the premises of Pacific Nash Motor Sales were burglarized. An automobile and a safe containing the company’s records and automobile ownership certificates were…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. BoylesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. KitchensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. ZerilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. TalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API