Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1932No. Docket No. 2167PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRICKE, J., pro tem.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of burglary in the second degree, his motion for a new trial denied and, having been previously convicted of a felony, he was sentenced to imprisonment in Folsom penitentiary. The sole point raised on this appeal is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the conviction.

The proof shows that Miss Jane Torkington on July 19, 1931, left her apartment at about 9:45 A. M. and did not return until about 10:15 that evening, at which time she found the door to the apartment unlocked, that her radio was gone, papers were scattered on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. People v. CloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. People v. CatalineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. GodlewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API