Legal Opinion

Town of Surry v. Starkey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1975No. 6982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

In this equity action the town of Surry seeks to enjoin defendants from excavating gravel on their land in violation of the applicable zoning ordinance. Defendants purchased twenty-four acres in 1964 with the primary intention of exploiting the various grades of gravel which it. contained. Since 1964 they have removed gravel from the land with the result that about six or seven acres are devoted exclusively to gravel removal at the present time. Defendant Roger M. Starkey testified that in addition to removing gravel he has used some of the land to grow corn and to produce loam.

At a town…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lachapelle v. GoffstownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sibson v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  2. Town of Nottingham v. HarveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Carbonneau v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Town of Goffstown v. ThibeaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Sibson v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API