Legal Opinion

Town of Nottingham v. Harvey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 1980No. 79-274, 79-275 and 79-464PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

The validity of the Town of Nottingham zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations is the issue presented by the defendant Harvey’s appeal. The town alleges that Harvey has violated both the zoning ordinance and the subdivision regulations by conveying subdivided lots of his property to his children. The Superior Court (Randall, J.) found that the town had validly adopted the ordinance and subdivision regulations and declared the conveyances void.

The town cross appeals the court’s refusal to assess civil penalties and to award costs and attorney’s fees. It argues that both actions are…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. In Re Russell C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. State v. BurroughsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. McKinney v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  5. Herron v. NorthwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Appeal of Concord Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. In re Robyn W.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. In re BazemoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Morgenstern v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API