Legal Opinion

Hadacheck v. Sebastian

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 20, 1915No. 32PublishedCited by 563 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. . The facts, which involve the constitutionality under the due process and equal protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment of an ordinance of Los Angeles prohibiting brick yards within certain limits of the city/ are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. . The facts, which involve the constitutionality under the due process and equal protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment of an ordinance of Los Angeles prohibiting brick yards within certain limits of the city/ are stated in the opinion. Although an ordinance is purported to have been enacted to protect the public health, morals or safety if it has no substantial relation to those objects, constitutional rights have been invaded and it is the duty of the court so to adjudge. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356; Lochner v. New…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the court.. Habeas corpus prosecuted in the Supreme Court of the State of California for the discharge of plaintiff in error from the custody of defendant in' error, Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles.

Plaintiff in error, to whom we shall refer as petitioner, was convicted of a misdemeanor for the violation of an ordinance of the City of Los Angeles which makes it unlawful for any person to establish or operate a brick yard or brick kiln, or any establishment, factory or place for the manufacture or burning’ of brick within described limits in the city.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. TranbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by563 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

558 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API