Legal Opinion

Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 14, 1962No. 78PublishedCited by 797 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The Town of Hempstead has enacted an ordinance regulating dredging and pit excavating on property within its limits. Appellants, who engaged in such operations prior to the enactment of the ordinance, claim that it in effect prevents them from continuing their business and therefore takes their property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The trial court held that the ordinance was a valid exercise of the town's police power, 19 Misc. 2d 176, 189 N. Y. S. 2d 577, and the Appellate Division affirmed, 9 App. Div. 2d 941, 196 N. Y. S. 2d 573. The New York Court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by797 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

792 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API