Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1962No. L. A. 26566PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action seeking declaratory relief and to enjoin defendant from enforcing a zoning restriction alleged to be unconstitutional insofar as it applies to prevent rock and gravel operations on plaintiffs’ property.

*518Plaintiff Valley Real Estate Company is the owner and Consolidated Rock Products Company is the lessee of 348 acres of land situated in the watercourse known as the Tujunga Wash, and lying northeasterly (upstream) of Hansen Dam in the San Fernando Valley. This property—about two miles long and one-quarter mile wide—runs in a generally…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Crownover v. MusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API