In Re the Disbarment of Gillard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISBARRING ATTORNEY
The above entitled matter came on for hearing before the court sitting en banc on June 28, 1978, for review of the petition filed by the Administrative Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board seeking the disbarment of respondent. In an opinion rendered on September 16, 1977, this Court found the referee’s findings and conclusions to be amply supported by the evidence but stayed the disbarment proceedings until the Board on Judicial Standards, to whom the case was referred to permit respondent to be heard on the question of his fitness to retain…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Matter of Complaint Against SeraphimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- In Re Complaint Concerning MieraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.