Legal Opinion
In Re Disbarment of John D. Greathouse
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1933No. 29,155PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Per curiam
The state board of law examiners filed an accusation against John D. Greathouse asking for his disbarment or discipline because of his alleged unethical solicitation of business. The Honorable Julius J. Olson, one of the judges of the fourteenth judicial district, was appointed to take the evidence and make findings of fact, which are adopted by us.
John D. Greathouse was admitted to practice law in this state in 1919 and has since been engaged in his professional work, with his office in the city of Minneapolis. He has specialized in the procuring and prosecution of damage suits on account of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Integration of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.