Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2007No. 200,302-8PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*324¶1 This attorney discipline case arose out of Bradley R. Marshall’s representation of several longshoremen in a workplace racial discrimination case. The Washington State Bar Association’s (Association) hearing officer and the Association’s Disciplinary Board (Board) found that Marshall improperly shared his fees with Wayne Perryman, a nonlawyer, and then took steps to conceal the fee sharing arrangement. They also found that Marshall inflated his costs and failed to provide an adequate settlement accounting to his clients. In addition, Marshall failed to properly advise his clients of the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API