In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*324¶1 This attorney discipline case arose out of Bradley R. Marshall’s representation of several longshoremen in a workplace racial discrimination case. The Washington State Bar Association’s (Association) hearing officer and the Association’s Disciplinary Board (Board) found that Marshall improperly shared his fees with Wayne Perryman, a nonlawyer, and then took steps to conceal the fee sharing arrangement. They also found that Marshall inflated his costs and failed to provide an adequate settlement accounting to his clients. In addition, Marshall failed to properly advise his clients of the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- In Re Disc. Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against PreszlerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.