Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 2008No. F054911PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEVY, Acting P. J.
While appellant, Douglas R. Hansen, was employed by respondent, California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), as a vocational instructor at the Correctional Custody Institution (CCI), CDCR’s Office of Internal Affairs began an investigation into allegations that Hansen had engaged in misconduct and criminal activity. The alleged criminal activity included violations of Penal Code section 289.6, subdivision (a)(3) (prohibits sexual activity with inmates) and Penal Code section 4570 (prohibits unauthorized communications with inmates). Shortly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Robinson v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Minor v. Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Laker v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Diego v. Pilgrim United Church of ChristCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.