Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1999No. S062156PublishedCited by 470 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

Must a defendant, moving specially under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (hereafter section 425.16 or the anti-SLAPP1 statute) to strike a cause of action arising from a statement made before, or in connection with an issue under consideration by, a legally authorized official proceeding, demonstrate separately that the statement concerned an issue of public significance? In accordance with the plain language of the statute and in consonance with discernible legislative intent, as well as for reasons of sound public policy, we conclude not. Accordingly, we reverse…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by470 opinions

  1. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002

465 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API