Legal Opinion
Chodos v. Cole
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 2012No. B236361PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*696Opinion
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
A cross-complaint was filed against Attorney Hillel Chodos (Chodos) and another attorney for malpractice in connection with their representation in, and settlement of, a marital dissolution and related proceedings. Chodos cross-complained against other attorneys for indemnification for any malpractice award against him because, he alleged, those other attorneys had rendered advice concerning, reviewed, and approved the settlement of the dissolution and related proceedings. The attorneys successfully moved to strike Chodos’s cross-complaint under Code of Civil…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Gaynor v. Bulen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sanowicz v. BacalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Southern California Gas Co. v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- J-M Manufacturing Co. v. Phillips & Cohen LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Loanvest I, LLC v. UtrechtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.