Legal Opinion

City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio Investments

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 2013No. G046397PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Dennis D’Alessio and D’Alessio Investments, LLC (collectively, D’Alessio), own commercial real property at 440 Fair Drive in Costa Mesa, California (the Property). In April 2011, the City of Costa Mesa (the City) sued D’Alessio and various tenants at the Property to abate a public nuisance—namely, alleged acts of prostitution at several massage establishments and the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries in violation of the City’s zoning code. The trial court granted preliminary injunctions in favor of the City in August 2011, enjoining the prohibited practices during…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Boris Levitt v. Yelp! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Monster Energy Company v. SchechterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. City of Montebello v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Area 51 Prods., Inc. v. City of Alameda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API