Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Magill

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1936No. Civ. 1610PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOVEL, J., pro tem.

This in an action for rescission of a contract of sale of a twenty-acre orange grove situated in San Bernardino County. In their fifth amended complaint plaintiffs allege the due execution of the contract wherein defendants Magill agreed to sell and plaintiffs agreed to buy twenty acres of oranges therein described, together with all pots and heating equipment on said land and 167 shares of water stock for the total purchase price of $55,000, payable $1,000 in cash, $7,200 represented by a house and lot with the furnishings therein owned by plaintiffs and the balance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Brimmer v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Burke v. Board of Trustees Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Los Molinos Land Co. v. MacKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Rodgers v. WittenmyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Pitt v. MallalieuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API