Legal Opinion

Ruinello v. Murray

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1951No. L. A. 21714Published

1Opinion of the Court

36 Cal.2d 687 (1951)

HENRY RUINELLO, Appellant

v.

DOROTHY CLUNE MURRAY, Respondent.

L. A. No. 21714.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Feb. 7, 1951.

Seymour D. Sommer for Appellant.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Frederic H. Sturdy and John T. Pigott, Jr., for Respondent.

TRAYNOR, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after a demurrer to his third amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

Plaintiff alleges that in October, 1945, he and defendant entered into an oral agreement whereby in consideration of plaintiff's giving up a "permanent life-time position" with another…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API