Legal Opinion

Ruinello v. Murray

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1951No. L. A. 21714PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after a demurrer to his third amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

Plaintiff alleges that in October, 1945, he and defendant entered into an oral agreement whereby in consideration of plaintiff’s giving up a “permanent life-time position” with another employer as engineer and superintendent of the 834 South Broadway Building and taking a similar position with defendant, the owner of the Ninth and Broadway Building in Los Angeles, for the term of five years, defendant would pay plaintiff a monthly salary of $350 plus a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Bowers Window & Door Co. v. DearmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API