Burke v. Board of Trustees Etc.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Jordan, Treat & Brann, and Jordan & Brann, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
The appellant seeks by this proceeding to obtain a writ of mandate, commanding the board of trustees of the police relief and pension fund of the city and county of San Francisco, the respondent herein, to pay to her the sum of $596 from said fund, which she claims to be entitled to receive by virtue of certain provisions of the charter of said city and county. In her petition therefor she alleges that she is the surviving widow of John Burke, and that her husband was appointed a member of the police department of San Francisco, February 10, 1874; that on January 5, 1903, on his application…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Nicols v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Gibbs v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Marro v. CRANSTON GEN. TREASURERSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.